Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KAEFER UK & IrelandKAEFER UK & Ireland
VS
Bouygues ConstructionBouygues Construction
KAEFER UK & Ireland

KAEFER UK & Ireland

Riverside House, Jarrow, NE32 3DP, GB

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kaeferltd.co.uk
756/1000Fair

KAEFER UK & Ire­land is a lead­ing pro­vider of tech­nical in­dus­trial ser­vices, part of the global KAEFER Group of com­pan­ies. KAEFER in the UK & Ire­land serves a large and grow­ing range of in­dus­tries with as­set in­teg­rity ser­vices. These ser­vices in­clude ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:693
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78 280, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Bouygues Construction employs 35,600 people around the world, all driven by the greatest and most exciting responsibility of all – building for life. For our customers in more than 50 countries, we deliver much more than projects. We build to create spaces, connectio...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:24,731
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KAEFER UK & Ireland

KAEFER UK & Ireland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KAEFER UK & Ireland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KAEFER UK & Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KAEFER UK & Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KAEFER UK & Ireland

KAEFER UK & Ireland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KAEFER UK & Ireland or Bouygues Construction ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KAEFER UK & Ireland or Bouygues Construction ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KAEFER UK & Ireland and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8