Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG companyKab Seating Ltd - a CVG company
VS
Arçelik TürkiyeArçelik Türkiye
Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company

Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company

7800 Walton Pkwy, New Albany, 43054, US

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kabseating.com
761/1000Fair

CVG Seating is one brand, made of many – our near century old brands like National Seating & KAB Seating provide the foundation for our global engineered seating offerings today. We specialize in the engineering, manufacturing, and supply of durable suspension seating...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:112
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Arçelik Türkiye

Arçelik Türkiye

Karaağaç Caddesi, İstanbul, 34445, TR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arcelikglobal.com
791/1000Fair

Arçelik Türkiye olarak, "Dünyaya Saygılı Dünyada Saygın" misyonuyla yola çıkıyoruz ve teknoloji, insan kaynağı ve üretim gücümüzü sürdürülebilir bir gelecek için kullanıyoruz. 1955 yılında başlayan yolculuğumuz bugün, 22 marka, 46 üretim tesisi, 55.000 çalışan ve 58 ül...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:11,496
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company

Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arçelik Türkiye

Arçelik Türkiye

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arçelik Türkiye in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arçelik Türkiye (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arçelik Türkiye cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company

Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Arçelik Türkiye

Arçelik Türkiye

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company company and Arçelik Türkiye company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company and Arçelik Türkiye, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company and Arçelik Türkiye, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company or Arçelik Türkiye ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company or Arçelik Türkiye ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company and Arçelik Türkiye, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kab Seating Ltd - a CVG company and Arçelik Türkiye, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2