Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JW Marriott Bucharest Grand HotelJW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel
VS
Meliá Hotels InternationalMeliá Hotels International
JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel

JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel

Calea 13 Septembrie 90, Bucharest, 050726, RO

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile

Located in an area of historic and national interest, JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel in Romania is the only five-star, hotel in the district and is in close proximity to the stately Palace of Parliament and People’s Salvation Cathedral. Culturally rich and with a s...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:143
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Meliá Hotels International

Meliá Hotels International

C/Gremi Boters 24, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, ES, 07009

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://ow.ly/Ks4b50Jzfcu
720/1000Moderate

Welcome to Meliá Hotels International! From Mallorca to the world, our story is an exciting journey that began more than six decades ago and has led us to become one of the largest hotel chains on the planet and the most sustainable in Europe (S&P Global). With more t...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:17,457
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel

JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Meliá Hotels International

Meliá Hotels International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meliá Hotels International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Meliá Hotels International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meliá Hotels International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel

JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Meliá Hotels International

Meliá Hotels International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MEL2129181122

FAQ

Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel company and Meliá Hotels International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel and Meliá Hotels International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel and Meliá Hotels International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel or Meliá Hotels International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel or Meliá Hotels International ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel and Meliá Hotels International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel and Meliá Hotels International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19374
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19373
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19372
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19371
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-12372
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2