Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Just Eat for BusinessJust Eat for Business
VS
JDE Peet'sJDE Peet's
Just Eat for Business

Just Eat for Business

City Pantry Ltd, Fleet Place House, 2 Fleet Place, London , London, EC4M 7RF, GB

Last Update: 28/02/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

We’re Just Eat for Business. We deliver great food to your workplace. We partner with the best restaurants and caterers to bring delicious and exciting food to your offices and remote teams, whatever the occasion. With office deliveries and solutions for your remote ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

Oosterdoksstraat 80, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1011 DK

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jdepeets.com/
801/1000Good

JDE Peet’s is the world’s leading pure-play coffee company, serving approximately 4,400 cups of coffee per second in more than 100 markets. Guided by our ‘Reignite the Amazing’ strategy, we are focusing on brand-led growth across three big bets: Peet’s, L’OR, and Jacobs...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,426
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Just Eat for Business

Just Eat for Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Just Eat for Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JDE Peet's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Just Eat for Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Just Eat for Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JDE Peet's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JDE Peet's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Just Eat for Business

Just Eat for Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Just Eat for Business company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Just Eat for Business and JDE Peet's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Just Eat for Business and JDE Peet's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Just Eat for Business or JDE Peet's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Just Eat for Business or JDE Peet's ?
Between Just Eat for Business and JDE Peet's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Just Eat for Business and JDE Peet's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA