Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LSDH, site JFALSDH, site JFA
VS
ADMADM
LSDH, site JFA

LSDH, site JFA

ZI Rimsdorf, Sarre-Union, 67260, FR

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lsdh.fr
747/1000Moderate

JUS DE FRUITS D’ALSACE (groupe LSDH) conditionne des jus de fruits et de légumes, des nectars, des boissons aux fruits et des infusions en bouteilles verre, briques carton et bouteilles PET du 20 cl au 2 litres. Nos clients sont des industriels, des distributeurs et de...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:102
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ADM

ADM

77 W Wacker Dr, Chicago, 60601, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.adm.com
799/1000Fair

ADM unlocks the power of nature to enrich the quality of life. We’re an essential global agricultural supply chain manager and processor, providing food security by connecting local needs with global capabilities. We’re a premier human and animal nutrition provider, off...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:40,197
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LSDH, site JFA

LSDH, site JFA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ADM

ADM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LSDH, site JFA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ADM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LSDH, site JFA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LSDH, site JFA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ADM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ADM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LSDH, site JFA

LSDH, site JFA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ADM

ADM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LSDH, site JFA company and ADM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LSDH, site JFA and ADM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LSDH, site JFA and ADM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LSDH, site JFA or ADM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LSDH, site JFA or ADM ?
Between LSDH, site JFA and ADM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LSDH, site JFA and ADM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2