Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Juniper Networks

Juniper Networks Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

juniper.net

Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniper’s sole mission has been to create innovative products and solutions that meet the growing demands of the connected world. Juniper Networks is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, with over 9,000 employees in 50 countries and nearly $5 billion in revenue. Our customers include the top 100 global service providers and 30,000 enterprises, including the Global Fortune 100 as well as hundreds of federal, state and local government agencies and higher educational organizations. At Juniper Networks, we


Juniper Networks A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Juniper Networks
Company Information
Website:http://www.juniper.net
Employees number:10,258
Number of followers:894,915
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:juniper.net
Juniper Networks Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 600 and 649
logo
Juniper NetworksSoftware Development
Updated:
10/04/2026
641/1000
Poor
Caa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Juniper Networks Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Juniper NetworksSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Juniper Networks
Juniper NetworksPoor
Current Score
641Caa (POOR)
01000
7 incidents
-30.33 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
648Before Incident
MAY 2026
645Before Incident
APRIL 2026
645Before Incident
Vulnerability
10 Apr 2026Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks: Juniper Networks Default Password Vulnerability Let Attacker Take Full Control of the Device

Critical Juniper vLWC Vulnerability Exposes Networks to Full Admin Takeover

641After Incident
CRITICAL-4
JUN1775809436
Critical Juniper vLWC Vulnerability Exposes Networks to Full Admin Takeover A severe security flaw in Juniper Networks’ Support Insights Virtual Lightweight Collector (vLWC) appliances has been disclosed, allowing unauthenticated attackers to gain full administrative control of affected devices. Tracked as CVE-2026-33784, the vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 9.8, reflecting its ease of exploitation no prior access or user interaction is required. The issue stems from a default password hardcoded into the vLWC software, which ships with a pre-configured, highly privileged administrator account. Unlike secure deployments that enforce password changes during initial setup, the vLWC fails to mandate this step. If administrators overlook manual credential updates, the device remains protected only by a publicly known default password, granting attackers immediate access to sensitive network functions. Exploitation could enable threat actors to intercept data, modify configurations, or use compromised collectors as launch points for deeper network infiltration. The flaw affects all vLWC versions prior to 3.0.94. Juniper’s Security Incident Response Team (SIRT) discovered the issue internally during routine testing, with no known active exploits reported at the time of disclosure. However, the simplicity of scanning for default credentials makes this a high-priority threat, particularly for automated botnets and ransomware groups. Juniper has released vLWC 3.0.94 to patch the enforcement gap. For organizations unable to upgrade immediately, the company advises manually changing the default password via the JSI Shell and reviewing configuration settings to prevent unauthorized access. The fix underscores the risks of overlooked default credentials in enterprise deployments.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive network functions, configurations, and data interceptionSystems Affected: Juniper Networks Support Insights Virtual Lightweight Collector (vLWC) appliancesOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized administrative control, network infiltrationBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to security flaw
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Network configurations, sensitive data interceptionSensitivity Of Data: High (administrative control)
MARCH 2026
659Before Incident
Cyber Attack
06 Mar 2026Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks and Alibaba Cloud: Malware Operators Hijack Network Devices For DDoS Attacks and Crypto Mining

Cybercriminals Shift Focus to Network Infrastructure as New Malware Strains Emerge

642After Incident
CRITICAL-17
JUNALI1773930337
Cybercriminals Shift Focus to Network Infrastructure as New Malware Strains Emerge Security researchers have uncovered a surge in attacks targeting network infrastructure, including routers, firewalls, and IoT devices, as threat actors pivot away from traditional endpoints. This trend, once dominated by nation-state actors, is now being exploited by financially motivated attackers for large-scale DDoS campaigns and cryptocurrency mining. On March 6, 2026, researchers identified two new malware strains CondiBot and Monaco designed to compromise Linux-based systems and network devices. CondiBot, a Mirai-derived botnet variant, infects devices across ARM, MIPS, and x86 architectures, disabling reboot functions and removing competing malware before launching DDoS attacks. It spreads via multiple download methods, including wget, curl, and TFTP, and connects to a command-and-control (C2) server for further instructions. Meanwhile, Monaco, written in Go, scans the internet for exposed SSH services, using brute-force attacks with common passwords to gain access. Once inside, it deploys Monero mining software, kills competing miners, and exfiltrates stolen credentials to its C2 infrastructure often hosted on Alibaba Cloud. The malware targets servers, routers, and Juniper networks, optimizing system performance to maximize cryptocurrency output. These campaigns reflect a broader shift in cyber threats, with attackers increasingly exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities and weak configurations in internet-facing systems like VPNs and gateways. Network devices pose a unique risk due to limited security monitoring, allowing attackers to maintain persistence, intercept traffic, and move laterally within compromised environments. The rise of CondiBot and Monaco underscores how cybercriminals are blending disruption with profit-driven tactics, making network infrastructure a critical attack vector.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MalwareDDoSCryptocurrency Mining
MOTIVATION
Financial gainDisruption
IMPACT
Stolen credentialsRoutersFirewallsIoT devicesLinux-based systemsJuniper networksVPNsGatewaysLateral movement within compromised environmentsTraffic interceptionPersistence in networks
DATA BREACH
Credentials
FEBRUARY 2026
729Before Incident
Vulnerability
27 Feb 2026Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks: Juniper Networks PTX Vulnerability Allows Full Router Takeover, Exposing Networks

Juniper Networks Patches Critical PTX Series Router Vulnerability (CVE-2026-21902)

659After Incident
CRITICAL-70
JUN1772173422
Juniper Networks Patches Critical PTX Series Router Vulnerability (CVE-2026-21902) Juniper Networks has released an out-of-cycle security bulletin addressing a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-21902) in its PTX Series routers running Junos OS Evolved. The flaw, rated 9.8 (CVSS v3.1) and 9.3 (CVSS v4.0), allows unauthenticated, remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges, enabling full device takeover. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect permission assignment in the On-Box Anomaly Detection framework, a default-enabled service designed to monitor unusual network behavior. Due to the flaw, the framework is exposed over an externally accessible port, bypassing authentication requirements. Attackers can exploit this to gain unrestricted control, potentially intercepting traffic, altering configurations, or launching further attacks. Affected Systems: - Junos OS Evolved (PTX Series only) - Versions: 25.4R1-EVO to 25.4R1-S1-EVO (before 25.4R1-S1-EVO) and 25.4R2-EVO - Unaffected: Junos OS Evolved versions before 25.4R1-EVO and standard Junos OS Juniper discovered the issue during internal testing, with no evidence of active exploitation reported. However, due to its severity, immediate action is recommended. Mitigation: - Patch: Upgrade to 25.4R1-S1-EVO, 25.4R2-EVO, 26.2R1-EVO, or later. - Workarounds: - Restrict access via firewall filters/ACLs (allowing only trusted networks). - Disable the vulnerable service using the CLI command: `request pfe anomalies disable`. The flaw highlights risks in core network infrastructure, particularly when default services expose critical attack surfaces. Administrators are urged to prioritize updates to prevent potential compromise.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: PTX Series routers running Junos OS EvolvedOperational Impact: Full device takeover, potential traffic interception, configuration alteration, or further attacks
JANUARY 2026
660Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
726Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
655Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
652Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
650Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
647Before Incident
JULY 2025
644Before Incident
MARCH 2025
767Before Incident
Breach
01 Mar 2025Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks

UNC3886 Attack on Juniper Networks Junos OS Routers

712After Incident
CRITICAL-55
JUN000031325
Mandiant researchers discovered custom backdoors deployed by China-linked espionage group UNC3886 on outdated Juniper Networks Junos OS routers. These TINYSHELL-based backdoors aimed for long-term persistence and stealth, targeting internal networking infrastructure and ISP routers. The backdoors imitated legitimate binaries and bypassed Junos OS security mechanisms, which could potentially lead to privileged access abuse, network authentication service compromises, and further covert operations within affected systems. The incident highlights significant vulnerabilities within critical networking devices and represents a strategic threat to the defense, technology, and telecommunications sectors.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Espionage
MOTIVATION
Long-term persistence and stealth
IMPACT
Juniper Networks Junos OS routersPrivileged access abuseNetwork authentication service compromisesCovert operations
JANUARY 2025
766Before Incident
Breach
01 Jan 2025Juniper Networks
Canadian Tire, Cisco, VMware and Juniper: Security Affairs newsletter Round 565 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION

Cybersecurity Roundup: Major Breaches, State-Backed Threats, and Critical Vulnerabilities

679After Incident
CRITICAL-87
CISVMWJUNCAN1772332146
Cybersecurity Roundup: Major Breaches, State-Backed Threats, and Critical Vulnerabilities A wave of high-profile cyber incidents, state-sponsored attacks, and critical vulnerabilities has dominated recent cybersecurity news. Law Enforcement Actions & Espionage Spanish police arrested a young hacker for exploiting a payment gateway to book luxury hotel stays for just one cent. Meanwhile, a former U.S. defense contractor executive received an 87-month prison sentence for selling stolen trade secrets, including zero-day exploits, to a Russian broker. In a separate case, a Romanian national pleaded guilty to selling unauthorized access to Oregon state government networks and other U.S. victims. State-Backed Threats & APT Activity Google’s Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) disrupted a China-linked APT, UNC2814, halting attacks on 53 organizations across 42 countries. The Lazarus Group, a North Korean APT, deployed Medusa ransomware against a Middle East target, while APT28 (Russia) launched Operation MacroMaze, exploiting webhooks for covert data exfiltration. Dutch intelligence warned of Russia escalating hybrid attacks, preparing for a prolonged standoff with Western nations. Critical Vulnerabilities & Exploits The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added multiple flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, including: - A Soliton Systems K.K FileZen vulnerability. - Cisco SD-WAN flaws, abused since 2023 for full admin control. - BeyondTrust (CVE-2026-1731) and VMware Aria Operations vulnerabilities enabling remote attacks. Juniper issued an emergency patch for a critical PTX router RCE flaw, while Check Point researchers exposed flaws in Claude Code that could turn untrusted repositories into attack vectors. Ransomware & Data Breaches - Everest ransomware hit Vikor Scientific’s supplier, stealing data of 140,000 patients. - ShinyHunters breached CarGurus, exposing 12.4 million users. - ManoMano, a European DIY chain, suffered a breach impacting 38 million customers. - Canadian Tire disclosed a 2025 breach affecting 38 million users. - Olympique Marseille confirmed an attempted cyberattack following a data leak. Emerging Threats & AI Risks - 12 million exposed .env files revealed widespread security misconfigurations. - Aeternum, a new botnet, hides commands in Polygon smart contracts. - An AI-powered campaign compromised 600 FortiGate systems globally. - Arkanix Stealer, an AI-assisted info-stealer, briefly operated before shutting down. - CrowdStrike reported attackers moving through networks in under 30 minutes. Geopolitical & Industry Developments - Apple’s iPhone and iPad became the first consumer devices cleared for NATO ‘RESTRICTED’ classification. - The U.S. Treasury sanctioned an exploit broker network for theft and sale of government cyber tools. - Iran’s internet faced near-total blackouts amid U.S. and Israeli strikes. - Ukraine reported cyberattacks on its energy grid being used to guide missile strikes. Malware & Campaigns - UAT-10027, a stealthy campaign, targeted U.S. education and healthcare with the Dohdoor backdoor. - Starkiller, a phishing service, proxies real login pages, including MFA. - North Korean actors deployed Medusa ransomware in a Middle East attack. - A wormable XMRig campaign used BYOVD (Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver) and a timed kill switch for stealth. The past week underscored the growing sophistication of cyber threats, from state-sponsored espionage to AI-driven attacks and large-scale data breaches.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
APT ActivityRansomwareData BreachVulnerability ExploitationEspionageMalware Campaign
MOTIVATION
Financial GainEspionageData TheftSabotageGeopolitical
IMPACT
140,000 patients (Vikor Scientific supplier)12.4 million users (CarGurus)38 million customers (ManoMano)38 million users (Canadian Tire)Payment gatewaysGovernment networksHealthcare systemsE-commerce platformsEnergy gridsNATO-classified devicesDisrupted servicesData exfiltrationNetwork compromiseOlympique MarseilleCanadian TireManoMano140,000 patients12.4 million users38 million customers
DATA BREACH
Patient dataUser dataCustomer dataTrade secretsGovernment network access140,00012.4 million38 million38 millionHighMediumYesYes (Ransomware).env filesYes
DECEMBER 2024
783Before Incident
Cyber Attack
11 Dec 2024Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks

Juniper Networks SSR Compromise

766After Incident
LOW-17
JUN000122224
On December 11, 2024, Juniper Networks identified a security breach where multiple customers' Session Smart Router (SSR) products running default passwords were compromised. The attackers leveraged the devices to conduct Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks as part of the Mirai botnet's activity. This security event resulted in unusual network behavior, including port scanning, failed SSH logins, spikes in traffic, and connections from known malicious IP addresses. Juniper Networks has issued recommendations to customers for strengthening security practices and mitigating future risks. This incident underscores the importance of strong password policies and regular security monitoring to prevent exploitation of network devices. No data leaks or critical threats to personal, financial, or regional economic security were reported.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
DDoS Attack
MOTIVATION
Conduct DDoS Attacks
IMPACT
Session Smart Router (SSR) productsUnusual network behaviorPort scanningFailed SSH loginsSpikes in trafficConnections from known malicious IP addresses
JUNE 2024
784Before Incident
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2024Juniper Networks
Juniper Networks

UNC3886 Targets Juniper Networks Routers with Custom Backdoors

782After Incident
CRITICAL-2
JUN000031625
In mid-2024, China-linked cyber espionage group UNC3886 targeted outdated Juniper Networks Junos OS MX routers with custom backdoors. The deployment of TINYSHELL-based backdoors, which allowed for stealthy, persistent access, showed a sophisticated understanding of system internals and posed a significant threat. This attack rendered the organization vulnerable to long-term espionage activities, primarily affecting the defense, technology, and telecommunications sectors in the US and Asia. The security incident not only undermined the integrity of Juniper Networks' devices but also put sensitive customer and employee data at risk.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber Espionage
MOTIVATION
Espionage
IMPACT
Customer DataEmployee DataJuniper Networks Junos OS MX routersBrand Reputation Impact: Significant
DATA BREACH
Customer DataEmployee DataSensitivity Of Data: High

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Juniper Networks ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Juniper Networks's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Juniper Networks ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Juniper Networks's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?