Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JunduJundu
VS
Jindal Steel Ltd.Jindal Steel Ltd.
Jundu

Jundu

Rodovia SP 215 Km 116, Descalvado, São Paulo, 13690-000, BR

Last Update: 05/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jundu.com.br
757/1000Fair

Na Jundu, somos uma família de profissionais dedicados, mais de 300 forças unificadas por um propósito que nos impulsiona: transformar de maneira responsável recursos minerais em soluções geradoras de riqueza para a sociedade. Com Ciência e Inovação somos guiados por pr...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:269
Subsidiaries:87
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066

Last Update: 25/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jindalsteel.in
804/1000Good

Jindal Steel is one of India’s foremost integrated steel producers, renowned for its scale, efficiency, and commitment to excellence. Operating on a robust mine-to-metal model, the Company leverages captive resources, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and a global di...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:20,037
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jundu

Jundu

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Steel Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jundu in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jundu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jundu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jindal Steel Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jindal Steel Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jundu

Jundu

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jundu company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jundu and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jundu and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jundu or Jindal Steel Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jundu or Jindal Steel Ltd. ?
Between Jundu and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jundu and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA