Comparison Overview
Jumia Côte d'Ivoire

Jumia Côte d'Ivoire
None, None, Abidjan, None, CI, None
Last Update: 22/01/2026
Jumia Group est la destination en ligne n°1 en Côte d’Ivoire pour trouver la plus large gamme de produits et services. Jumia Group a été fondé en 2012 avec la conviction qu’internet peut améliorer la vie des gens en les aidant à surmonter les défis auxquels ils font fac...

1000 W Maude, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94085
Last Update: 18/06/2026
Founded in 2003, LinkedIn connects the world's professionals to make them more productive and successful. With more than 1 billion members worldwide, including executives from every Fortune 500 company, LinkedIn is the world's largest professional network. The company h...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Jumia Côte d'Ivoire













Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jumia Côte d'Ivoire in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
LinkedIn has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Jumia Côte d'Ivoire (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jumia Côte d'Ivoire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - LinkedIn (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LinkedIn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Jumia Côte d'Ivoire

FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.