Comparison Overview
Jacksonville University College of Law

Jacksonville University College of Law
76 Laura St, Jacksonville, 32205, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Through a unique partnership with the City of Jacksonville, the Jacksonville University College of Law meets the city’s need for quality legal education by preparing students with a unique, hands-on learning experience to become high-quality lawyers. We offer students s...

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Administration Bldg Suite 1070, BIRMINGHAM, 35294-0110, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Jacksonville University College of Law







University of Alabama at Birmingham






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jacksonville University College of Law in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2026.
Incident History - Jacksonville University College of Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jacksonville University College of Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Alabama at Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Alabama at Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Jacksonville University College of Law

University of Alabama at Birmingham
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Anil-matcha Open-Generative-AI up to 1.0.11/2.0.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /api/upload-binary of the component S3 Upload. Such manipulation of the argument x-proxy-target-url leads to unrestricted upload. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is f013270957f75e439eaf97eb2a93decb32a4543e. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue.
- https://github.com/Anil-matcha/Open-Generative-AI/
- https://github.com/Anil-matcha/Open-Generative-AI/commit/f013270957f75e439eaf97eb2a93decb32a4543e
- https://github.com/Anil-matcha/Open-Generative-AI/issues/310
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90603
- https://vuldb.com/submit/914005
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/403185
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/403185/cti
A vulnerability was determined in Anil-matcha Open-Generative-AI up to 1.0.11/2.0.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function renderHistory of the file ImageStudio.js of the component Studio Components. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
A vulnerability was found in getzep graphiti up to 0.30.2. Affected is an unknown function of the file server/graph_service/main.py of the component REST API. The manipulation results in improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Sales and Inventory System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/inv_edit1.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
The mcumgr SMP settings-management group handlers settings_mgmt_read(), settings_mgmt_write(), and settings_mgmt_delete() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/grp/settings_mgmt/src/settings_mgmt.c allocate a key_name buffer (and, for read, a data buffer) via k_malloc() when CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_SETTINGS_BUFFER_TYPE_HEAP is enabled, relying on the end: label to k_free() them. When CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_SETTINGS_ACCESS_HOOK is also enabled and the application access hook rejects a request by returning status MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC, the handler executed return ret_rc; directly, bypassing end: and leaking the heap allocation on every rejected request. The settings handlers are reachable over the unauthenticated SMP transport (Bluetooth LE, UART, or UDP, depending on product configuration). The access hook is the mechanism applications use to deny unauthorized settings access, and MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC is a common rejection style, so an attacker who can send settings read/write/delete commands that the hook rejects triggers a heap leak on each attempt. Because the leaked memory is never reclaimed until reboot, a sustained stream of rejected requests monotonically exhausts the kernel heap until k_malloc() fails, denying mcumgr service and impacting any other heap consumer on the device — a denial of service. The impact is availability-only; there is no memory corruption or information disclosure. Only configurations that select the heap buffer type, enable the access hook, and register a hook that returns MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC are affected (the default stack buffer type cannot leak).