Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JSAB Technologies LimitedJSAB Technologies Limited
VS
TSMCTSMC
JSAB Technologies Limited

JSAB Technologies Limited

Unit 912, 9/F, Building 16W, 16 Science Park West Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin, Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, undefined, undefined, HK

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jsab-tech.com/
753/1000Fair

JSAB Technologies Limited is a high-tech company, specializing in the design, research and development (R&D), and sales of power semiconductor devices.

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:17
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TSMC

TSMC

8, Li-Hsin Rd. 6, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, 300, TW

Last Update: 03/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tsmc.com
801/1000Good

Established in 1987, TSMC is the world's first dedicated semiconductor foundry. As the founder and a leader of the Dedicated IC Foundry segment, TSMC has built its reputation by offering advanced and "More-than-Moore"​ wafer production processes and unparalleled manufac...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:26,129
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
JSAB Technologies Limited

JSAB Technologies Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TSMC

TSMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JSAB Technologies Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TSMC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - JSAB Technologies Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JSAB Technologies Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TSMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TSMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
JSAB Technologies Limited

JSAB Technologies Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TSMC

TSMC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TSM232080925
🔒 Incident : Breach
TATTSMQUA1782491371
🔒 Incident : Breach
TSM1774419953

FAQ

Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited company and TSMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited and TSMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited and TSMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - JSAB Technologies Limited or TSMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - JSAB Technologies Limited or TSMC ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited and TSMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between JSAB Technologies Limited and TSMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA