Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JRK Property HoldingsJRK Property Holdings
VS
Coldwell BankerColdwell Banker
JRK Property Holdings

JRK Property Holdings

11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, 90025, US

Last Update: 12/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.jrk.com
662/1000Weak

JRK Property Holdings is a Los Angeles–based real estate private equity firm founded in 1991 by James Lippman, Robert Rooney, and Keith Holmes. The firm specializes in multifamily and hospitality investments, offering fully integrated services across investment, asset m...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:408
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Coldwell Banker

Coldwell Banker

175 Park Ave, Madison, 07940, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://coldwellbanker.com
749/1000Moderate

Welcome to Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC, a company founded in 1906 on a commitment to professionalism and customer service which remains the cornerstone of our business philosophy today. We are the nation’s oldest real estate company and our experience has helped mak...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:42,805
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
JRK Property Holdings

JRK Property Holdings

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coldwell Banker

Coldwell Banker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

JRK Property Holdings has 44.13% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coldwell Banker in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - JRK Property Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JRK Property Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coldwell Banker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coldwell Banker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
JRK Property Holdings

JRK Property Holdings

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
JRK1778611537
Coldwell Banker

Coldwell Banker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GRU1769118538

FAQ

Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between JRK Property Holdings company and Coldwell Banker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between JRK Property Holdings and Coldwell Banker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between JRK Property Holdings and Coldwell Banker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - JRK Property Holdings or Coldwell Banker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - JRK Property Holdings or Coldwell Banker ?
Between JRK Property Holdings and Coldwell Banker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between JRK Property Holdings and Coldwell Banker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1