Comparison Overview

J.P. Morgan

VS

Lloyds Banking Group

J.P. Morgan

270 Park Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.jpmorgan.com

J.P. Morgan is a leader in financial services, offering solutions to clients in more than 100 countries with one of the most comprehensive global product platforms available. We have been helping our clients to do business and manage their wealth for more than 200 years. Our business has been built upon our core principle of putting our clients'​ interests first. J.P. Morgan is part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a global financial services firm. Social Media Terms and Conditions: https://bit.ly/JPMCSocialTerms © 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer Disability/Veteran.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 78,072
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Lloyds Banking Group

25 Gresham Street, London, UK, GB, EC2V 7HN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849
https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/

Our purpose is Helping Britain Prosper. We do this by creating a more sustainable and inclusive future for people and businesses, shaping finance as a force for good. We're part of an ever-changing industry and are currently on a journey to shape the financial services of the future, whilst supporting our customers’ changing needs. The scale and reach of our Group means we can offer a broad range of opportunities to learn, grow and develop. Our values-led culture and approach to inclusion and diversity means we can all make a real difference together.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 61,434
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpmorgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyds-banking-group.jpeg
Lloyds Banking Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J.P. Morgan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lloyds Banking Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.P. Morgan in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lloyds Banking Group in 2025.

Incident History — J.P. Morgan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.P. Morgan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lloyds Banking Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lloyds Banking Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpmorgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lloyds-banking-group.jpeg
Lloyds Banking Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2006
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Lloyds Banking Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to J.P. Morgan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

J.P. Morgan and Lloyds Banking Group have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Lloyds Banking Group company and J.P. Morgan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group company nor J.P. Morgan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Lloyds Banking Group company and J.P. Morgan company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Lloyds Banking Group company nor J.P. Morgan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J.P. Morgan company nor Lloyds Banking Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither J.P. Morgan company nor Lloyds Banking Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

J.P. Morgan company employs more people globally than Lloyds Banking Group company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J.P. Morgan nor Lloyds Banking Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References