Comparison Overview
J.P. Morgan
J.P. Morgan
270 Park Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 19/06/2026
J.P. Morgan is a leader in financial services, offering solutions to clients in more than 100 countries with one of the most comprehensive global product platforms available. We have been helping our clients to do business and manage their wealth for more than 200 years...
Lincoln Financial
150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, PA, US, 19087
Last Update: 08/06/2026
Lincoln Financial (NYSE: LNC) helps people to confidently plan for their version of a successful future. We focus on identifying a clear path to financial security, with products including annuities, investments, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan ser...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
J.P. Morgan
Lincoln Financial
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
J.P. Morgan has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Lincoln Financial has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - J.P. Morgan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
J.P. Morgan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lincoln Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lincoln Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
J.P. Morgan
Lincoln Financial
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.