Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

J.P. Morgan Workplace SolutionsJ.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions
VS
SanlamSanlam
J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

N/A

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

J.P. Morgan recognizes that your company's success is fuelled by the exceptional commitment and dedication of its employees. Workplace Solutions offer a comprehensive suite of technology and services designed to empower your team to confidently manage their workplace ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:274
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sanlam

Sanlam

ZA

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sanlam.co.za
784/1000Fair

We’ve finally given a name to that special something a person exudes when they have a plan for their finances. It’s called The F Factor – and now that you know its name, it’s time you feel it too. Let's unlock your financial confidence, together.​ Our team is online we...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:19,623
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sanlam

Sanlam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanlam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sanlam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanlam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sanlam

Sanlam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions company and Sanlam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions and Sanlam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions and Sanlam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions or Sanlam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions or Sanlam ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions and Sanlam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions and Sanlam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA