Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jonas Fitness, Inc.Jonas Fitness, Inc.
VS
SS&C TechnologiesSS&C Technologies
Jonas Fitness, Inc.

Jonas Fitness, Inc.

1322 Space Park Dr, Houston, 77058, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jonasfitness.com
753/1000Fair

Jonas Fitness is the leader in Enterprise Facility Management and Billing software, and has long been the trusted partner of the largest and most successful operators in the industry. We are a true technology partner that provides the Health, Fitness and Wellness indust...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:98
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SS&C Technologies

SS&C Technologies

80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT, US, 06095

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ssctech.com
790/1000Fair

SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 22,000 fi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:25,837
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jonas Fitness, Inc.

Jonas Fitness, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SS&C Technologies

SS&C Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jonas Fitness, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SS&C Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jonas Fitness, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jonas Fitness, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SS&C Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SS&C Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jonas Fitness, Inc.

Jonas Fitness, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
JON312072825
SS&C Technologies

SS&C Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SSC173329622

FAQ

Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. and SS&C Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. and SS&C Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jonas Fitness, Inc. or SS&C Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jonas Fitness, Inc. or SS&C Technologies ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. and SS&C Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jonas Fitness, Inc. and SS&C Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8