Comparison Overview
Johnson Controls Fire Detection
Johnson Controls Fire Detection
Johnson Controls Headquarters, Cork, T12 X8N6, IE
Last Update: 23/02/2026
At Johnson Controls we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy, and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places, and the planet. Fire safety i...
Midea Group
6 Midea Avenue, Foshan, Guangdong, CN
Last Update: 24/09/2026
Midea Group aspires to the vision of “Bringing Great Innovations to Life”, upholding the Founders’ philosophy of creating a better life through technology. Midea Group has evolved into a global leading technology company specializing in six major businesses including Sm...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Johnson Controls Fire Detection
Midea Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls Fire Detection in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Midea Group in 2026.
Incident History - Johnson Controls Fire Detection (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Johnson Controls Fire Detection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Midea Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Midea Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Johnson Controls Fire Detection
Midea Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.