Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Johnson MattheyJohnson Matthey
VS
Air LiquideAir Liquide
Johnson Matthey

Johnson Matthey

5th Floor, 2 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7AD, GB

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.matthey.com/
736/1000Moderate

We are Johnson Matthey, a global leader in sustainable technologies. Our customers include many of the world’s leading energy, chemicals and automotive companies. They depend on us to use our cutting-edge science to enable them to decarbonise, reduce harmful emissions ...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:8,574
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Air Liquide

Air Liquide

75 quai d'Orsay, Paris, 75007, FR

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.airliquide.com
827/1000Good

Air Liquide is a world leader in gases, technologies and services for industry and healthcare. Present in 72 countries with 67,800 employees, the Group serves more than 4 million customers and patients. Oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen are essential small molecules for lif...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:39,659
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Johnson Matthey

Johnson Matthey

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Air Liquide

Air Liquide

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson Matthey in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Air Liquide in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Johnson Matthey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Matthey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Air Liquide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Air Liquide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Johnson Matthey

Johnson Matthey

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOH251080525
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOH1021090725
Air Liquide

Air Liquide

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Johnson Matthey company and Air Liquide company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Johnson Matthey and Air Liquide, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Johnson Matthey and Air Liquide, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Johnson Matthey or Air Liquide ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Johnson Matthey or Air Liquide ?
Between Johnson Matthey and Air Liquide, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Johnson Matthey and Air Liquide, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA