Comparison Overview

Johnson Controls

VS

Parker Hannifin

Johnson Controls

Milwaukee, Cork, Ireland, IE, T12 X8N6
Last Update: 2025-12-11

At Johnson Controls, we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. Building on a proud history of 140 years of innovation, we deliver the blueprint of the future for industries such as healthcare, schools, data centers, airports, stadiums, manufacturing and beyond through OpenBlue, our comprehensive digital offering. Today, Johnson Controls offers the world`s largest portfolio of building technology and software as well as service solutions from some of the most trusted names in the industry. Visit www.johnsoncontrols.com for more information.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 65,242
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Parker Hannifin

6035 Parkland Blvd, Cleveland, OH, US, 44124
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Parker Hannifin is a Fortune 250 global leader in motion and control technologies. For more than a century the company has been enabling engineering breakthroughs that lead to a better tomorrow. Learn more at www.parker.com or on Twitter @parkerhannifin. Executive Officers: Jennifer A. Parmentier, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Andrew D. Ross, President and Chief Operating Officer Todd Leombruno, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Mark J. Hart, Executive Vice President, Human Resources and External Affairs See our complete Global Leadership Team - https://www.parker.com/us/en/about-parker/parker-leadership.html Visit our Parker Technology Blog at http://blog.parker.com Follow us: X at http://twitter.com/parkerhannifin Facebook at http://facebook.com/parkerhannifin YouTube channel http://youtube.com/parkervideo Youtube Product and support channel: https://www.youtube.com/@ParkerProductsSupport Instagram - http://instagram.com/parkerhannifin The company's products are vital to virtually everything that moves or requires control, including the manufacture and processing of raw materials, durable goods, infrastructure development and all forms of transport. Key technology areas are aerospace, climate control, electromechanical, filtration, fluid and gas handling, hydraulics, pneumatics, process control, sealing and shielding and human motion. Traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PH,"​ Parker is strategically diversified, value-driven and well positioned for global growth as the industry consolidator and supplier of choice. Interested in a career at Parker Hannifin: Website at www.parker.com/careers

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 26,337
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-controls.jpeg
Johnson Controls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parker-hannifin.jpeg
Parker Hannifin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Johnson Controls
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Parker Hannifin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Johnson Controls has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Parker Hannifin has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Johnson Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Parker Hannifin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parker Hannifin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-controls.jpeg
Johnson Controls
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Devices, Default Credentials, Unpatched Software Vulnerabilities, Lack of Firewalls/Encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parker-hannifin.jpeg
Parker Hannifin
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, malware deployment
Motivation: financial gain, cybercrime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Johnson Controls company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Parker Hannifin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Parker Hannifin company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Johnson Controls company.

In the current year, Parker Hannifin and Johnson Controls have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Both Parker Hannifin company and Johnson Controls company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Parker Hannifin company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Johnson Controls company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Parker Hannifin company nor Johnson Controls company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Johnson Controls company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Parker Hannifin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Parker Hannifin company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Johnson Controls company.

Johnson Controls company employs more people globally than Parker Hannifin company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Johnson Controls nor Parker Hannifin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N