Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling SolutionsJohnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions
VS
thyssenkruppthyssenkrupp
Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions

Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions

Milwaukee, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

Johnson Controls helps you meet your industrial heating and cooling needs by delivering value, increased sustainability, and the stability of a proven price per KW. Built to reduce your energy costs, our smart designs maximise efficiency and improve operational flexibil...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp Allee 1, Essen, 45143, DE

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

thyssenkrupp is an international industrial and technology group with more than 93,000 employees. In the fiscal year 2024/2025, the company generated sales of around €33 billion in 48 countries. Its business activities are bundled in five segments: Automotive Technology...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:36,306
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions

Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for thyssenkrupp in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - thyssenkrupp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

thyssenkrupp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions

Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THY355092125

FAQ

Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions and thyssenkrupp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions and thyssenkrupp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions or thyssenkrupp ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions or thyssenkrupp ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions and thyssenkrupp, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Johnson Controls Industrial Heating and Cooling Solutions and thyssenkrupp, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9