Comparison Overview
Johnson Controls Asia Pacific
Johnson Controls Asia Pacific
518-11 Fu Quan Bei Road, Shanghai, 200335, CN
Last Update: 19/03/2026
At Johnson Controls (NYSE:JCI) we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. With ...
GEA Group
Ulmenstraße 99, Düsseldorf, 40476, DE
Last Update: 23/09/2026
GEA is one of the largest technology suppliers for food processing and a wide range of other industries. The global group specializes in machinery, plants, as well as process technology and components. GEA provides resource-efficient solutions for sophisticated product...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Johnson Controls Asia Pacific
GEA Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls Asia Pacific in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GEA Group in 2026.
Incident History - Johnson Controls Asia Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Johnson Controls Asia Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GEA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GEA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Johnson Controls Asia Pacific
GEA Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.