Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Johnson Controls América LatinaJohnson Controls América Latina
VS
thyssenkruppthyssenkrupp
Johnson Controls América Latina

Johnson Controls América Latina

Latin America, OO

Last Update: 16/01/2026

View Profile

En Johnson Controls (NYSE:JCI) transformamos los entornos donde las personas viven, trabajan, aprenden y se divierten. Como líder mundial en edificios inteligentes, saludables y sostenibles, nuestra misión es reimaginar el rendimiento de las edificaciones para servir a ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp Allee 1, Essen, 45143, DE

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

thyssenkrupp is an international industrial and technology group with more than 93,000 employees. In the fiscal year 2024/2025, the company generated sales of around €33 billion in 48 countries. Its business activities are bundled in five segments: Automotive Technology...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:36,306
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Johnson Controls América Latina

Johnson Controls América Latina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls América Latina in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for thyssenkrupp in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Johnson Controls América Latina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls América Latina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - thyssenkrupp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

thyssenkrupp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Johnson Controls América Latina

Johnson Controls América Latina

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THY355092125

FAQ

Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina and thyssenkrupp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina and thyssenkrupp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Johnson Controls América Latina or thyssenkrupp ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Johnson Controls América Latina or thyssenkrupp ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina and thyssenkrupp, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Johnson Controls América Latina and thyssenkrupp, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2