Comparison Overview

Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen

VS

Universität Luzern

Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen

Ludwigstraße 23, Gießen, Gießen, Hessen, 35390, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Impressum: https://www.uni-giessen.de/link-impres Datenschutzerklärung: https://www.uni-giessen.de/ueber-uns/datenschutz Willkommen bei der JLU! Exzellente Forschung, hervorragende Lehre, internationale Strahlkraft: Die Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen hat viel zu bieten. Mit ca. 28.000 Studierenden ist die JLU die zweitgrößte Hochschule in Hessen, sie prägt die Region Mittelhessen entscheidend mit und profitiert von der Nähe zur Metropolregion Frankfurt/Rhein-Main. Moderne und Tradition ist für uns kein Gegensatz: Die JLU ist eine zukunftsorientierte Hochschule, die mit Stolz auf ihre über 400-jährige Geschichte zurückblickt. Sie wurde im Jahre 1607 gegründet und trägt heute den Namen eines ihrer berühmtesten Wissenschaftler: Justus Liebig, der in Gießen ab 1824 fast drei Jahrzehnte lang als Professor der Chemie forschte und lehrte. Liebig stellte im 19. Jahrhundert nicht nur die organische Chemie auf eine neue wissenschaftliche Grundlage, sondern führte zudem die systematische forschungsnahe und praxisbezogene Ausbildung von Studenten im Labor ein und verband Grundlagenforschung mit einer Vielzahl konkreter Anwendungsbereiche. Liebig vernetzte sich mit Kollegen in ganz Europa und leistete einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur internationalen Ausrichtung, die bis heute prägend für unsere Universität ist. In diesem Sinne steht der Name Justus-Liebig-Universität heute für anwendungsnahe („translationale“) Forschung auf höchstem Niveau, herausragende Nachwuchsförderung und internationale Vernetzung, insbesondere in den beiden Profilbereichen der JLU, den Lebens- und Kulturwissenschaften.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2,751
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universität Luzern

Frohburgstrasse 3, Luzern, undefined, 6002, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 800 and 849

Die Universität Luzern ist die jüngste Universität der Schweiz. Ihre Wurzeln reichen bis ins Jahr 1600 zurück, doch als moderne Hochschule besteht sie erst seit 2000. Die Universität Luzern besteht aus den vier Fakultäten für Theologie, für Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, für Rechtswissenschaft und für Wirtschaftswissenschaften sowie dem Departement Gesundheitswissenschaften und Medizin. Ein besonderes Merkmal ist ihr Streben nach Vernetzung: In Forschung, Lehre und Dienstleistungen schafft sie Verbindungen zwischen Konfessionen und Religionen, zwischen Zeiten und Kulturen, zwischen Philosophie, Politik, Recht und Wirtschaft.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 768
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jlugiessen.jpeg
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-lucerne.jpeg
Universität Luzern
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universität Luzern
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen in 2025.

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universität Luzern in 2025.

Incident History — Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universität Luzern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universität Luzern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jlugiessen.jpeg
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-lucerne.jpeg
Universität Luzern
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Universität Luzern company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universität Luzern company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company.

In the current year, Universität Luzern company and Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universität Luzern company nor Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universität Luzern company nor Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universität Luzern company nor Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company nor Universität Luzern company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Universität Luzern company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company.

Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen company employs more people globally than Universität Luzern company, reflecting its scale as a Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen nor Universität Luzern holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L