Comparison Overview

Jindal Steel Ltd.

VS

Glencore

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jindalsteel.in/

Jindal Steel is one of India’s foremost integrated steel producers, renowned for its scale, efficiency, and commitment to excellence. Operating on a robust mine-to-metal model, the Company leverages captive resources, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and a global distribution network to deliver high-performance steel solutions. With an investment footprint exceeding USD 12 billion, Jindal Steel runs state-of-the-art facilities in Angul, Raigarh, and Patratu, and maintains strategic operations across India and Africa. Its diversified and future-ready product portfolio underpins core sectors such as infrastructure, construction, and manufacturing, powering progress through strength and sustainability. Take the next step in your career with Jindal Steel by submitting your application to our Talent Acquisition team at "[email protected]"

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 19,267
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Glencore

Baarermattstrasse 3, Baar, 6340, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849
https://http://www.glencore.com

Glencore is one of the world’s largest global diversified natural resource companies and a major producer and marketer of more than 60 commodities that advance everyday life. Through a network of assets, customers and suppliers that spans the globe, we produce, process, recycle, source, market and distribute the commodities that support decarbonisation while meeting the energy needs of today.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 17,269
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindalsteel-ltd..jpeg
Jindal Steel Ltd.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glencore.jpeg
Glencore
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jindal Steel Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glencore
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glencore in 2026.

Incident History — Jindal Steel Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jindal Steel Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glencore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glencore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindalsteel-ltd..jpeg
Jindal Steel Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glencore.jpeg
Glencore
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glencore company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glencore company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company.

In the current year, Glencore company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glencore company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glencore company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glencore company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. company nor Glencore company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Glencore company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company.

Jindal Steel Ltd. company employs more people globally than Glencore company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. nor Glencore holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References