Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JHA iPay SolutionsJHA iPay Solutions
VS
Tata CapitalTata Capital
JHA iPay Solutions

JHA iPay Solutions

663 W HWY 60, Monett, 65708, US

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile

We offer the latest innovations in payment processing by integrating with any online banking platform & providing configurable consumer, small business, person-to-person, & mobile payment solutions.

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:19
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Mumbai, 400013, IN

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tatacapital.com
802/1000Good

Tata Capital Limited is a subsidiary of Tata Sons Limited. The Company is registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a Core Investment Company and offers through itself and its subsidiaries fund and fee-based financial services to its customers, under the Tata Capital...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24,293
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
JHA iPay Solutions

JHA iPay Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JHA iPay Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Capital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - JHA iPay Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JHA iPay Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
JHA iPay Solutions

JHA iPay Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions company and Tata Capital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions and Tata Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions and Tata Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - JHA iPay Solutions or Tata Capital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - JHA iPay Solutions or Tata Capital ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions and Tata Capital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between JHA iPay Solutions and Tata Capital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9