Comparison Overview
JGC Philippines, Inc.

JGC Philippines, Inc.
2109 Prime St. Madrigal Business Park, Ayala Alabang, Muntinlupa City, 1780, PH
Last Update: 10/02/2026
JGC Philippines, Inc. is the biggest Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) services company in the Philippines for Industrial Facilities. It was granted the first ”AAAA” PCAB License on August 9, 2016. JGC Philippines takes pride in having more than a thous...

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Fortune Global 500 Company, Bharat Petroleum is the second largest Indian Oil Marketing Company and one of the premier integrated energy companies in India, engaged in refining of crude oil and marketing of petroleum products, with a significant presence in the upstream...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

JGC Philippines, Inc.







Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JGC Philippines, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in 2026.
Incident History - JGC Philippines, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JGC Philippines, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

JGC Philippines, Inc.

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.