Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

jFSEjFSE
VS
T-Systems InternationalT-Systems International
jFSE

jFSE

84 a, Boulevard Chanzy, Boulogne-sur-Mer, Hauts-de-France, FR, 62200

Last Update: 18/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bcb.fr
751/1000Fair

RESIP édite également le moteur de facturation jFSE. Cette solution permet de prendre en charge toutes les obligations requises par le cahier des charges Sesam-Vitale, pour les médecins généralistes, les spécialistes, les auxiliaires médicaux (activité libérale et centr...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

Hahnstraße 43d, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, DE

Last Update: 08/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.t-systems.com
761/1000Fair

Your digitalization partner with industry expertise With locations in more than 26 countries and over 26,000 employees (2024), T-Systems is one of the leading providers of digital services in Europe. The Deutsche Telekom subsidiary is headquartered in Germany and has a...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,749
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
jFSE

jFSE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for jFSE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

T-Systems International has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - jFSE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

jFSE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - T-Systems International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
jFSE

jFSE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
T-SDEU1791464432

FAQ

Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between jFSE company and T-Systems International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between jFSE and T-Systems International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between jFSE and T-Systems International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - jFSE or T-Systems International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - jFSE or T-Systems International ?
Between jFSE and T-Systems International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between jFSE and T-Systems International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3