Comparison Overview
JETMS

JETMS
H510 Churchill Way, Biggin Hill Airport, Westerham, TN16 3BN, GB
Last Update: 05/12/2025
JETMS is a global provider for aircraft interior solutions, renowned for innovation, quality, and customer satisfaction. Providing and offering market-leading services that include premium customized monuments, lounges, bars, sky shops, seat modules, galleys, and stowag...

Emirates
Dubai, Dubai, 686, AE
Last Update: 04/09/2026
Based in Dubai, the Emirates Group employs over 120,000 staff from more than 170 nationalities. The Emirates Group’s extensive and diverse international portfolio includes the world’s largest international airline, Emirates, and one of the largest combined air services ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

JETMS







Emirates






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JETMS in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Emirates in 2026.
Incident History - JETMS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JETMS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Emirates (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emirates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

JETMS

Emirates
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.