Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JeppesenJeppesen
VS
QantasQantas
Jeppesen

Jeppesen

55 Inverness Drive, Denver, 80112, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jeppesen.com
756/1000Fair

For more than 80 years, Jeppesen has made it possible for pilots and their passengers to safely and efficiently reach their destinations. Today, this pioneering spirit continues as Jeppesen delivers transformative information and optimization solutions to improve the ef...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:1,342
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Qantas

Qantas

10 Bourke Road, Mascot, 2020, AU

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.qantas.com
100/1000Critical

We would like to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the local lands and waterways on which we live, work and fly. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.   Spirit is everything to us, and joining the Qantas team means bringing your spirit to ours. We have...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:18,076
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jeppesen

Jeppesen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Qantas

Qantas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jeppesen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Qantas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jeppesen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jeppesen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Qantas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qantas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jeppesen

Jeppesen

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JEP225371122
Qantas

Qantas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI1122911112425
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
QAN2902229100425
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI0292402112125

FAQ

Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jeppesen company and Qantas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jeppesen and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jeppesen and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jeppesen or Qantas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jeppesen or Qantas ?
Between Jeppesen and Qantas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jeppesen and Qantas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA