Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jennings O'Donovan & PartnersJennings O'Donovan & Partners
VS
EpirocEpiroc
Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

Finisklin Business Park, Sligo, Connacht, IE, F91 RHH9

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.jodireland.com
738/1000Moderate

Jennings O’Donovan is a multidisciplinary consulting engineering firm specialising in renewable energy, water supply, wastewater treatment and in the provision of planning and environmental services. Founded in 1950, the company, has offices across the country in Sligo...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:89
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Epiroc

Epiroc

Sickla Industriväg 19, Nacka, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.epiroc.com
804/1000Good

Performance to succeed today. Technology to lead tomorrow. Epiroc is your partner for mining and infrastructure equipment. We're excited to build on proven expertise and performance with the same people and a bold new drive to make what's good even better. Just lik...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,558
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Epiroc

Epiroc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jennings O'Donovan & Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epiroc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jennings O'Donovan & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Epiroc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epiroc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JEN2732127102425
Epiroc

Epiroc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company and Epiroc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jennings O'Donovan & Partners or Epiroc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jennings O'Donovan & Partners or Epiroc ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners and Epiroc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jennings O'Donovan & Partners and Epiroc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2