Jenkins A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Jenkins
Company Information
Website:https://jenkins.io/
Employees number:38
Number of followers:16,375
NAICS:
Industry Type:Information Technology & Services
Homepage:jenkins.io
Jenkins Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
JenkinsInformation Technology & Services
Updated:
06/08/2026
06/08/2026
730/1000
Moderate
Ba
Jenkins Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
JenkinsInformation Technology & Services
Score locked

JenkinsModerate
Current Score
730Ba (MODERATE)
01000
6 incidents
-5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
735
Vulnerability
06 Aug 2026 • Jenkins
Jenkins: Critical Jenkins Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Execute Malicious Code on Controller
Critical Jenkins Vulnerability (CVE-2026-70426) Enables Remote Code Execution
730
CRITICAL-5
JEN1786026533
Critical Jenkins Vulnerability (CVE-2026-70426) Enables Remote Code Execution
Jenkins has disclosed a critical security flaw (CVE-2026-70426) that allows attackers to bypass security filters and execute arbitrary code on Jenkins controllers. The vulnerability, rated with a Critical CVSS score, stems from a gap in the JEP-200 class filter used to block unsafe Java deserialization in agent-to-controller communications.
### Affected Versions
The flaw impacts:
- Jenkins 2.575 and earlier
- Jenkins LTS 2.568.1 and earlier
- Remoting library versions 3384.v60d89463d9e0 and earlier (excluding 3355.3357.v931d3c992987)
### Exploitation Mechanism
Jenkins relies on the Remoting library (agent.jar/remoting.jar) for controller-agent communication, which involves serialized Java objects. While the JEP-200 filter is designed to block dangerous classes, researchers discovered a fallback deserialization path that bypasses this protection.
An attacker with control over an agent, code execution on an existing agent, or Jenkins Agent/Connect permissions could exploit this flaw to deserialize restricted Java classes, leading to arbitrary code execution on the controller.
### Impact & Risks
A compromised Jenkins controller poses severe risks, including:
- Exposure of source code, secrets, and build credentials
- Access to deployment keys and software supply chain pipelines
- Full control over CI/CD environments
The attack surface is limited to classes in the Jenkins core classpath (bundled with Jenkins or the Java platform), excluding plugin dependencies.
### Mitigation & Fixes
Jenkins addressed the issue in:
- Jenkins 2.576
- Jenkins LTS 2.568.2
These updates enforce the JEP-200 filter even in the fallback deserialization path. Organizations are advised to upgrade immediately and review Agent/Connect permissions to reduce exposure.
For environments unable to patch immediately, Jenkins has provided a temporary workaround in its [SECURITY-3911-3930 GitHub repository](https://github.com/jenkinsci/security-advisories). The flaw was reported through the European Commission’s Jenkins Bug Bounty Program.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JULY 2026
735
JUNE 2026
739
Vulnerability
15 Jun 2026 • Jenkins
Jenkins: Critical Jenkins RCE Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation in the Wild
Critical Jenkins Deserialization Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation (CVE-2026-53435)
734
CRITICAL-5
JEN1781526230
Critical Jenkins Deserialization Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation
A severe deserialization flaw in Jenkins, tracked as CVE-2026-53435, is being actively exploited by threat actors following its public disclosure on June 10, 2026. The vulnerability affects Jenkins 2.567 and earlier and Jenkins LTS 2.555.2 and earlier, allowing attackers to manipulate HTTP request handling and hijack server execution flow via malicious config.xml submissions.
Exploitation enables arbitrary code execution (RCE), user impersonation, unauthorized HTTP requests, access to the Jenkins Script Console, and sensitive file reads including system credentials. With a CVSS score of 9.0, the flaw is classified as Critical.
Honeypot telemetry detected attack attempts within hours of disclosure, with active exploitation confirmed by June 15, 2026. Attack traffic originated from IP 194.247.182.44, linked to AS57043 (HOSTKEY B.V.), a Netherlands-based hosting provider frequently abused by threat actors. The observed attack targeted port 443, blending with legitimate HTTPS traffic, and included a path traversal attempt to read /etc/passwd using default credentials (admin:admin).
Jenkins has released patches:
- Jenkins Weekly: Upgrade to 2.568 or later
- Jenkins LTS: Upgrade to 2.555.3 or later
Temporary mitigations include restricting access to the /job//config.xml endpoint, disabling anonymous access, and enforcing strong credentials. The advisory also addresses two lower-severity open-redirect flaws (CVE-2026-53436 and CVE-2026-53437*), though neither matches the criticality of CVE-2026-53435. A public proof-of-concept has accelerated exploitation, widening the attack window.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
MAY 2026
738
APRIL 2026
738
MARCH 2026
742
Vulnerability
18 Mar 2026 • Jenkins
Jenkins and Valve: New DDoS Malware Exploits Jenkins to Attack Valve Source Engine Game Servers
New DDoS Botnet Targets Valve Source Engine Game Servers via Exposed Jenkins Instances
737
MEDIUM-5
JENVAL1777645518
New DDoS Botnet Targets Valve Source Engine Game Servers via Exposed Jenkins Instances
Security researchers at Darktrace uncovered a sophisticated DDoS botnet exploiting misconfigured Jenkins servers to launch attacks against Valve Source Engine game infrastructure, including Counter-Strike and Team Fortress 2 servers. The malware, first detected on March 18, 2026, via Darktrace’s CloudyPots honeypot network, stands out for its cross-platform capabilities and precise targeting of the gaming sector a growing focus for cybercriminals, which Cloudflare ranks as the fourth most attacked industry globally.
The attack begins with threat actors scanning for Jenkins instances with weak or default credentials, leveraging an exposed remote code execution (RCE) endpoint to deploy malicious payloads. Once inside, the malware delivers Windows and Linux variants: on Windows, it downloads a disguised system update file, while on Linux, it executes a Bash script to fetch and run a payload from the /tmp directory. Both use a Vietnamese-hosted IP (103[.]177.110.202) for command-and-control (C2) and payload delivery an unusual consolidation that reduces operational resilience.
The botnet employs multiple DDoS techniques, including UDP floods, TCP push attacks, and HTTP request floods, with a particularly effective method called "attack_dayz." This tactic exploits Valve Source Engine’s query protocol, sending small requests that trigger disproportionately large responses, overwhelming servers with minimal attacker bandwidth. The malware also ensures persistence by:
- Manipulating Jenkins environment variables ("dontKillMe") to evade process timeouts.
- Renaming itself to mimic legitimate Linux kernel processes ("ksoftirqd/0" or "kworker").
- Using double forking and redirecting logs to /dev/null to avoid detection.
- Ignoring termination signals (SIGTERM) to resist manual shutdowns.
Once active, the malware connects to the C2 server, reporting system details and awaiting attack commands. It supports three utility functions: PING (keep-alive), !stop (termination), and !update (self-updating). Darktrace recommends blocking TCP port 5444 (used for C2 communication) and the identified attacker IP at the network perimeter, alongside securing Jenkins instances with strong authentication and restricting public access.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
FEBRUARY 2026
742
JANUARY 2026
746
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026 • Jenkins
Jenkins: Critical Jenkins Vulnerability Exposes Build Servers to Controller Takeover
Critical Jenkins Vulnerability (CVE-2026-70426) Enables Remote Code Execution on Controllers
741
CRITICAL-5
JEN1786011835
Critical Jenkins Vulnerability (CVE-2026-70426) Enables Remote Code Execution on Controllers
A severe vulnerability in Jenkins, tracked as SECURITY-3911 and CVE-2026-70426, allows attackers with Agent/Connect permissions or malicious Jenkins agents to execute arbitrary code on a Jenkins controller. The flaw, rated Critical (CVSS 9.0), stems from a bypass in the JEP-200 class filter, a security mechanism designed to restrict deserialization of untrusted Java objects in the Remoting library.
### Vulnerability Details
Jenkins uses the Remoting library (agent.jar/remoting.jar) to facilitate serialized object communication between controllers and build agents. While JEP-200 was introduced to block dangerous deserialization, researchers discovered that Remoting versions 3384.v60d89463d9e0 and earlier (excluding 3355.3357.v931d3c992987) fail to enforce the filter on classes resolved via a fallback deserialization path. Attackers can exploit this gap by crafting malicious serialized objects that load eligible classes from the Jenkins core classpath, leading to unrestricted code execution on the controller.
### Impact & Risks
A compromised Jenkins controller grants attackers access to:
- Build pipelines (modification, tampering, or injection of malicious code)
- Stored credentials (source-control tokens, cloud access keys, artifact repository logins)
- Deployment environments (pivoting into corporate systems)
- Release artifacts (supply chain attacks via altered binaries)
The vulnerability affects Jenkins 2.575 and earlier, as well as LTS 2.568.1 and earlier. Jenkins has released fixes in 2.576 and LTS 2.568.2, which enforce JEP-200 protections on the fallback path.
### Mitigation & Workarounds
While upgrading is the recommended solution, administrators unable to patch immediately can apply a vendor-provided workaround from the [Jenkins SECURITY-3911-3930 GitHub repository](https://github.com/jenkinsci/security-advisories). Additional defensive measures include:
- Restricting Agent/Connect permissions to trusted systems
- Isolating build agents from untrusted workloads
- Monitoring controller logs for suspicious Remoting activity
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
DECEMBER 2025
746
NOVEMBER 2025
746
OCTOBER 2025
745
SEPTEMBER 2025
745
JUNE 2025
749
Vulnerability
09 Jun 2025 • Jenkins
Jenkins
Critical XSS Vulnerability in Jenkins Gatling Plugin
744
CRITICAL-5
JEN302060925
A critical cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the popular Jenkins Gatling Plugin allows attackers to bypass Content-Security-Policy (CSP) protections. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-5806, affects Gatling Plugin version 136.vb_9009b_3d33a_e and poses significant risks to Jenkins environments utilizing this performance testing integration tool. The exploitation of this vulnerability requires users with the ability to modify Gatling report content, which typically includes developers, QA engineers, and system administrators with appropriate Jenkins permissions. Once exploited, attackers can execute arbitrary JavaScript code within the context of the Jenkins application, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized administrative actions. The high CVSS severity rating assigned to this vulnerability reflects its potential for significant impact on Jenkins’ infrastructure.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
MAY 2025
753
Vulnerability
01 May 2025 • Jenkins
Jenkins
Critical Command Injection Flaw in Jenkins Git Parameter Plugin (CVE-2025-53652)
748
CRITICAL-5
JEN537081025
A critical command injection vulnerability (CVE-2025-53652) in the Jenkins Git Parameter plugin has been exposed by VulnCheck. Initially rated as medium, the flaw allows remote code execution (RCE), enabling hackers to take control of unauthenticated Jenkins servers. Around 15,000 servers are at risk due to disabled security settings. The vulnerability permits attackers to inject malicious commands, potentially accessing sensitive data like master keys. Despite a patch being released, administrators can manually disable it, leaving systems exposed. VulnCheck warns that while widespread exploitation is unlikely, skilled attackers may use it for targeted attacks or deeper network infiltration.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Jenkins ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Jenkins's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Jenkins ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Jenkins's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?