Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jean Paul GAULTIERJean Paul GAULTIER
VS
KeringKering
Jean Paul GAULTIER

Jean Paul GAULTIER

325 rue Saint-Martin, PARIS, FR

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Fondée par son créateur éponyme en 1976, la maison Jean Paul Gaultier est un paradoxe parisien – mêlant les codes du style français à une rébellion iconoclaste, la qualité de la couture à une sensibilité urbaine, le choc au chic.   Réputé pour son tailoring audacieux et...

NAICS:4483
NAICS Definition:Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees:333
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kering

Kering

40, rue de Sèvres, PARIS, 75007, FR

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.kering.com/en
744/1000Moderate

Kering is a global, family-led luxury group, home to people whose passion and expertise nurture creative Houses across ready-to-wear and couture, leather goods, jewelry, eyewear and beauty: Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, Balenciaga, McQueen, Brioni, Boucheron, Po...

NAICS:4483
NAICS Definition:Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees:38,974
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jean Paul GAULTIER

Jean Paul GAULTIER

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kering

Kering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jean Paul GAULTIER in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kering in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jean Paul GAULTIER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jean Paul GAULTIER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jean Paul GAULTIER

Jean Paul GAULTIER

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kering

Kering

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KER0692106091525
🔒 Incident : Breach
KER3565635100325

FAQ

Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER company and Kering company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER and Kering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER and Kering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jean Paul GAULTIER or Kering ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jean Paul GAULTIER or Kering ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER and Kering, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jean Paul GAULTIER and Kering, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3