Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

JdV by HyattJdV by Hyatt
VS
Taj HotelsTaj Hotels
JdV by Hyatt

JdV by Hyatt

530 Bush Street, Suite 501, San Francisco, CA, 94108, US

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
774/1000Fair

A community for the spirited, the light-hearted, the young at heart, the hotels that are part of JdV by Hyatt are true reflections of the neighborhoods we call home. Embracing our namesake (joie de vivre), each property invites all to celebrate the joy of life and make ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:283
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Taj Hotels

Taj Hotels

9th Floor, Express Towers,, Mumbai, 400 021, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tajhotels.com
818/1000Good

Established in 1903, Taj is The Indian Hotels Company Limited’s (IHCL) iconic brand for the world’s most discerning travellers seeking luxury and authentic experiences. Taj has been rated as India’s Strongest Brand across all sectors for an unprecedented fourth time and...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:24,292
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
JdV by Hyatt

JdV by Hyatt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Taj Hotels

Taj Hotels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JdV by Hyatt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taj Hotels in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - JdV by Hyatt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JdV by Hyatt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Taj Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taj Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
JdV by Hyatt

JdV by Hyatt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Taj Hotels

Taj Hotels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between JdV by Hyatt company and Taj Hotels company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between JdV by Hyatt and Taj Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between JdV by Hyatt and Taj Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - JdV by Hyatt or Taj Hotels ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - JdV by Hyatt or Taj Hotels ?
Between JdV by Hyatt and Taj Hotels, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between JdV by Hyatt and Taj Hotels, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA