Comparison Overview

J D Wetherspoon

VS

MGM Resorts International

J D Wetherspoon

Central Park, Watford, WD24 4QL, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-15

J D Wetherspoon is a leading pub operator in the UK and Ireland. Back in 1979, founder chairman Tim Martin opened the very first Wetherspoon – in Muswell Hill, north London. Today, Tim and the company run over 850 pubs and hotels, spread right across the UK and, more recently, Ireland. During its history of over 40 years, Wetherspoon has repeatedly led the way with ground-breaking initiatives, picked up hundreds of awards (covering all aspects of pub life) and grown from a handful of staff to over 40,000 employees. The company seeks to develop its staff through effective and award-winning training and development, through a positive working environment and, of course, by means of a competitive pay packet. Every year, thousands of staff complete one or more of our award-winning training courses, not only preparing them to work safely and to the best of their ability, but also inspiring them to pursue positive career development. The company prides itself in offering, at all levels, excellent training and support.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 12,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MGM Resorts International

840 Grier Drive, Las Vegas, 89119, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 0 and 549

The resorts and casinos of MGM Resorts International™ are some of the most famous in the world. Our 28 destinations are renowned for their winning combination of quality entertainment, luxurious facilities, and exceptional customer service. We are actively expanding our presence globally, with potential developments in a number of domestic and international markets. At MGM Resorts International, we are all striving together to deliver an enticing blend of entertainment to every corner of the world. Many of our resorts are located in Las Vegas. Las Vegas features three of the largest convention centers in the U.S., spectacular entertainment, attractions, shopping, ​and world-famous resorts. Whether dancing fountains, incredible stage productions, casino action, museums or natural attractions such as Lake Mead, Vegas offers something for everyone. A stroll down our streets takes you around the globe, with recreations like climbing to the top of the Eiffel Tower or taking a Venetian gondola ride. From shimmering resort pools and spa rejuvenation to nonstop nightlife, Las Vegas promises an unforgettable career destination. With all of our unique and spectacular resorts and casinos, MGM Resorts International has a world of opportunities for you to discover excitement and rewards as you provide our guests with a wonderful and memorable experience. Take a closer look at our properties. We think you'll find an opportunity that's right for you. The 81,000 global employees of MGM Resorts are proud to be recognized as one of FORTUNE® Magazine’s World’s Most Admired Companies®.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 26,464
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd-wetherspoon1.jpeg
J D Wetherspoon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mgm-resorts-international.jpeg
MGM Resorts International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J D Wetherspoon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MGM Resorts International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J D Wetherspoon in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MGM Resorts International in 2026.

Incident History — J D Wetherspoon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J D Wetherspoon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MGM Resorts International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MGM Resorts International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd-wetherspoon1.jpeg
J D Wetherspoon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mgm-resorts-international.jpeg
MGM Resorts International
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Phishing, SIM Swapping, Hypervisor-Level Attacks
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Ransomware, Swatting, Extortion, DDoS, SIM Swapping, Cryptocurrency Theft
Motivation: Financial Gain, Retaliation, Ideology, Sexual Gratification, Notoriety
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Vishing, SIM-swapping, MFA Fatigue Attacks
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

J D Wetherspoon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MGM Resorts International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MGM Resorts International company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas J D Wetherspoon company has not reported any.

In the current year, MGM Resorts International company and J D Wetherspoon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

MGM Resorts International company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while J D Wetherspoon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

MGM Resorts International company has disclosed at least one data breach, while J D Wetherspoon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

MGM Resorts International company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while J D Wetherspoon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither J D Wetherspoon company nor MGM Resorts International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MGM Resorts International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to J D Wetherspoon company.

MGM Resorts International company employs more people globally than J D Wetherspoon company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J D Wetherspoon nor MGM Resorts International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N