Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) TbkPT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk
VS
Transnet Freight RailTransnet Freight Rail
PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk

Plaza Tol Taman Mini Indonesia Indah, East Jakarta, 13550, ID

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
732/1000Moderate

To support the economic growth, on March 1, 1978, the Government issued Regulation number 4 year 1978 on the establishment of PT Jasa Marga (persero) Tbk. Indonesia to provide a reliable road network in the country. Jasa Marga's 1978-constructed Jakarta-Bogor-Ciawi To...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:1,195
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Transnet Freight Rail

Transnet Freight Rail

15 Girton Road. Parktown , Johannesburg , 2193, ZA

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Transnet Freight Rail is the largest division of Transnet SOC Ltd. It is a world class heavy haul freight rail company that specialises in the transportation of freight. The company maintains an extensive rail network across South Africa that connects with other rail n...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:10,927
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transnet Freight Rail

Transnet Freight Rail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet Freight Rail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transnet Freight Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet Freight Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk

PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PTJ1824111122
Transnet Freight Rail

Transnet Freight Rail

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk company and Transnet Freight Rail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk and Transnet Freight Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk and Transnet Freight Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk or Transnet Freight Rail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk or Transnet Freight Rail ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk and Transnet Freight Rail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk and Transnet Freight Rail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8