Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Japan AirlinesJapan Airlines
VS
LufthansaLufthansa
Japan Airlines

Japan Airlines

Higashi-shinagawa 2-4-11, Shinagawa-ku, JP

Last Update: 07/06/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.jal.com/
575/1000Very Poor

Japan Airlines (JAL), Japan’s first private aviation company, was established in 1951 and is a member of the oneworld® Alliance. The airline operates a fleet of 227 aircraft (as of March 2024) and began renewing its international long-haul aircraft with the Airbus A350-...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:3,577
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Lufthansa

Lufthansa

Airportring, Frankfurt am Main, 60549, DE

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://lufthansa.com
781/1000Fair

Lufthansa is one of the world’s leading airlines, connecting passengers to over 200 destinations across 74 countries from our hubs in Frankfurt and Munich. As an industry pioneer, we are committed to shaping the future of sustainable aviation, investing in next-generat...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:19,452
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Japan Airlines

Japan Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lufthansa

Lufthansa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Japan Airlines has 51.22% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Japan Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Japan Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lufthansa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Japan Airlines

Japan Airlines

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JAP1770796780
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JAP1780792210
Lufthansa

Lufthansa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Japan Airlines company and Lufthansa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Japan Airlines and Lufthansa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Japan Airlines and Lufthansa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Japan Airlines or Lufthansa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Japan Airlines or Lufthansa ?
Between Japan Airlines and Lufthansa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Japan Airlines and Lufthansa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA