Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jani-King International, Inc.Jani-King International, Inc.
VS
ABM IndustriesABM Industries
Jani-King International, Inc.

Jani-King International, Inc.

16885 Dallas Pkwy, Addison, TX, US, 75001

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.janiking.com/
717/1000Moderate

Jani-King International has been a leader in the commercial cleaning services industry for 55 years as the first commercial cleaning franchise company with local support offices. Jani-King has developed comprehensive programs to address proper cleaning and disinfection ...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:2,124
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
ABM Industries

ABM Industries

1 Liberty St, New York, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abm.com
773/1000Fair

ABM is one of the world’s largest providers of integrated facility, engineering, and infrastructure solutions. Every day, our over 100,000 team members deliver essential services that make spaces cleaner, safer, and efficient, enhancing the overall occupant experience. ...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:31,364
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jani-King International, Inc.

Jani-King International, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABM Industries

ABM Industries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jani-King International, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABM Industries in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jani-King International, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jani-King International, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABM Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABM Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jani-King International, Inc.

Jani-King International, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JAN910072625
ABM Industries

ABM Industries

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABM020072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABM732072625

FAQ

Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. company and ABM Industries company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. and ABM Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. and ABM Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jani-King International, Inc. or ABM Industries ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jani-King International, Inc. or ABM Industries ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. and ABM Industries, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jani-King International, Inc. and ABM Industries, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2