Comparison Overview

JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL)

VS

Lowell Observatory

JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL)

161-04 Jamaica Avenue, Jamaica, Queens, New York, 11432, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Jamaica Center for Arts and Learning, Inc. (JCAL) is a multidisciplinary urban arts center, located in the diverse community of Southeast Queens. More than 35,000 people of all ages and backgrounds participate in our wide array of education, performing arts, and visual arts programs annually. JCAL's mission is to offer visual, performing and literary arts, arts education and artists’ programs to encourage participation in the arts and to contribute to the cultural enrichment of Queens and the Greater Metropolitan area. JCAL was founded in 1972 as part of a large-scale effort to revitalize the declining Jamaica business district. Downtown Jamaica, like many neighborhoods across the United States, experienced a long period of decline in the 1960s. In 1967, local artists, business leaders and community members came together to restore the decaying commercial corridor along Jamaica Avenue. They acquired the abandoned Queens Register of Titles and Deeds Building – a New York landmark listed on the National Register of Historic Places – and transformed it into an urban cultural center that would serve as a symbol of Jamaica’s reawakening and act as a magnet for businesses, shoppers, and residents returning to the downtown area. Today, the Center’s neo-Renaissance building features a 1,650 square foot visual arts gallery, a 99-seat proscenium theater, three painting and three dance studios, a ceramics studio, a computer lab, and a newly renovated music studio. Our programs for children, teens, and adults include a multicultural series of music, theater, and dance performances; film screenings and lectures; contemporary visual arts exhibitions; in-school artist residencies; a series of nearly 50 different arts workshops; and free or low-cost after-school and summer programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lowell Observatory

1400 Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ, US, 86001
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799

Named one of TIME's 100 Greatest Places and Best Science Museum by Newsweek readers, Lowell Observatory is an independent, non-profit research institution founded in 1894 by Boston mathematician Percival Lowell. More than 45,000 nights have passed since the first telescope arrived on Mars Hill. In that time, Lowell astronomers have been at the forefront of astronomical research. It was here that Clyde Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930 and V.M. Slipher first detected the expanding nature of the universe nearly two decades earlier. That tradition continues today with the observatory’s state-of-the-art Lowell Discovery Telescope and the ongoing discoveries being made by the current generation of Lowell astronomers and planetary scientists. In 2024, Lowell opened the Astronomy Discovery Center, which features a roof-top, open-air planetarium. Rather than a traditional enclosed planetarium in which guests view images of celestial bodies, this one takes advantage of Flagstaff’s exquisitely dark skies to look at the real thing—stars and their celestial buddies in their natural setting.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jamaica-center-for-arts-and-learning-inc-.jpeg
JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lowell-observatory.jpeg
Lowell Observatory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lowell Observatory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lowell Observatory in 2026.

Incident History — JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lowell Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lowell Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jamaica-center-for-arts-and-learning-inc-.jpeg
JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lowell-observatory.jpeg
Lowell Observatory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lowell Observatory company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lowell Observatory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company.

In the current year, Lowell Observatory company and JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lowell Observatory company nor JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lowell Observatory company nor JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lowell Observatory company nor JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company nor Lowell Observatory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company nor Lowell Observatory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lowell Observatory company employs more people globally than JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JAMAICA CENTER FOR ARTS AND LEARNING, INC. (JCAL) nor Lowell Observatory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N