Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China
VS
AdientAdient
捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China

捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China

Pudong New Area, 200000, CN

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

作为英国豪华汽车品牌,2023年,捷豹路虎发布“重塑未来”全球战略最新举措——品牌重塑策略与电动化进程,目标成为全球领先的新现代豪华主义汽车制造商。通过品牌重塑,捷豹路虎致力于为每个品牌打造独树一帜的品牌个性,以此加速企业愿景落地。 在可持续发展趋势的背景下,捷豹路虎致力于以更灵活的业务运营模式,以成为全球最令人向往的新现代豪华主义品牌创造者为目标,服务最尊崇的消费者。放眼2039年,捷豹路虎将达到贯穿整个供应链、产品研发及运营的净零碳排放目标。电动化是“重塑未来”战略的核心,捷豹路虎目标在2030年前成为全面电动化的新现代豪华主义...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:529
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Adient

Adient

49200 Halyard Dr, Plymouth, 48170, US

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.adient.com
751/1000Fair

Adient (NYSE: ADNT) is a global leader in automotive seating. With more than 65,000 employees in 29 countries, Adient operates ~200 manufacturing/assembly plants worldwide. We produce and deliver automotive seating for all major OEMs. From complete seating systems to in...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:16,930
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China

捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Adient

Adient

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adient in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Adient (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China

捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Adient

Adient

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China company and Adient company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China and Adient, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China and Adient, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China or Adient ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China or Adient ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China and Adient, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 捷豹路虎中国 Jaguar Land Rover China and Adient, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105222
SUMMARY

The alexpechkarev/google-maps Laravel package through 12.16 disables TLS certificate verification by default because the bundled config sets ssl_verify_peer to FALSE, which is passed to CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER. On-path attackers can present any certificate to intercept Google Maps web-service requests, steal the API key from the query string, and tamper with responses.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-04
UPDATED
Date2026-10-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105221
SUMMARY

The gist RubyGem before 6.1.0 contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability that allows on-path attackers to intercept HTTPS traffic because http_connection in lib/gist.rb sets VERIFY_NONE. Attackers can present any certificate to read or modify GitHub API traffic, stealing OAuth tokens and login credentials to read and modify the victim's gists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-04
UPDATED
Date2026-10-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105220
SUMMARY

Twine 2 desktop through 2.12.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in importStories() that executes markup from imported story files in the editor window. Attackers can craft a story file whose script calls the twineElectron openWithScratchFile IPC bridge to write and open a .bat file, executing code as the user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-04
UPDATED
Date2026-10-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-105167
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in kishor-23 food-waste-management-system 411989e3ecb82895e53dca7865f72145f03d7d93/b3a70b2c492dc9904de5be1ad9389bd79b87f82c. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file admin/donate.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument location can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-04
UPDATED
Date2026-10-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105166
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in kishor-23 food-waste-management-system 411989e3ecb82895e53dca7865f72145f03d7d93/b3a70b2c492dc9904de5be1ad9389bd79b87f82c. The affected element is the function insert of the file fooddonateform.php of the component Food Donation Form. Performing a manipulation of the argument image-choice results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-04
UPDATED
Date2026-10-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9