Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jacobsen ConstructionJacobsen Construction
VS
Kier GroupKier Group
Jacobsen Construction

Jacobsen Construction

5181 W. Amelia Earhart Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, US, 84116

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
713/1000Moderate

Located in Salt Lake City, Utah, Jacobsen Construction is ranked as one of the nation's top general contractors specializing in healthcare, higher education, commercial, civic, technology, historic renovation, and religious projects. As an employee-owned company, we’re ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:509
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Kier Group

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk
755/1000Fair

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:10,990
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jacobsen Construction

Jacobsen Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kier Group

Kier Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacobsen Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jacobsen Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacobsen Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jacobsen Construction

Jacobsen Construction

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JAC321080425
Kier Group

Kier Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jacobsen Construction company and Kier Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jacobsen Construction and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jacobsen Construction and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jacobsen Construction or Kier Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jacobsen Construction or Kier Group ?
Between Jacobsen Construction and Kier Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jacobsen Construction and Kier Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9