Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Jackson Lewis P.C. Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

jacksonlewis.com

Focused on employment and labor law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.’s 1,000+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged and stable, and share our clients’ goals to emphasize belonging and respect for the contributions of every employee.


JLP A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

JLP
Company Information
Website:https://www.jacksonlewis.com
Employees number:2,454
Number of followers:52,685
NAICS:54111
Industry Type:Law Practice
Homepage:jacksonlewis.com
JLP Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
JLPLaw Practice
Updated:
28/03/2026
664/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
JLP Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
JLPLaw Practice
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

JLP
JLPWeak
Current Score
664B (WEAK)
01000
2 incidents
-87 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
670Before Incident
MAY 2026
667Before Incident
APRIL 2026
666Before Incident
MARCH 2026
664Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
662Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
660Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
658Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
593Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
654Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
652Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
737Before Incident
Breach
28 Aug 2025JLP
Jackson Lewis (client - unnamed hospital)

Rise in Data Breach Class Action Litigation and Legal Defense Strategies

650After Incident
CRITICAL-87
JAC5892858091925
An unnamed hospital client of Jackson Lewis experienced a significant data breach where employee negligence (clicking on a phishing email) led to unauthorized access to sensitive systems. The breach triggered multiple class-action lawsuits, including one filed in a Pennsylvania state court after the plaintiff exploited a procedural loophole by serving the hospital directly instead of through formal channels. The exposed data likely included employee and patient records, with potential compromise of personal, financial, or health information (PHI). The hospital faced seven federal lawsuits and one state lawsuit, with plaintiffs alleging negligence, breach of implied contract, and statutory violations (e.g., California’s data protection laws). The case highlights vulnerabilities in incident response coordination, as the hospital failed to track the state court filing, leading to a default risk. Settlement negotiations favored the last-filed plaintiff due to jurisdictional leverage, increasing legal costs and reputational harm. The breach underscores risks tied to insufficient employee training, delayed forensic analysis, and broad notification strategies inflating litigation exposure (e.g., sending notices to 500,000 instead of the actual 100,000 affected).
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachClass Action LitigationLegal/Regulatory
MOTIVATION
Financial Gain (Plaintiff Firms)Exploitation of Legal Standing Loopholes
IMPACT
Increased litigation costsReputation damageResource diversion to legal defenseClass action lawsuits from notified individualsNegative publicityLoss of customer trustClass action lawsuits (negligence, implied contract, unjust enrichment, statutory claims in CA)Potential regulatory finesDiscovery risks exposing compliance gapsPlaintiffs allege risk despite lack of concrete harm (e.g., spam calls, dark web exposure)
DATA BREACH
PII (e.g., SSNs, emails, phone numbers)Potentially encrypted data (e.g., EMR records)Varies (examples: 1,000–1,000,000+)High (SSNs, financial data)Low (spam calls, dark web claims)Alleged in lawsuits (often unproven concrete harm)Encryption at rest (e.g., EMR systems) may limit harmSocial Security numbersEmail addressesPhone numbers
JULY 2025
737Before Incident
JANUARY 2022
761Before Incident
Breach
07 Jan 2022JLP
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Data Breach at Jackson Lewis P.C.

702After Incident
HIGH-59
JAC821072525
The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Jackson Lewis P.C. on August 31, 2023. The incident involved the theft of two hard drives containing personal information, which was discovered on January 7, 2022. The number of affected individuals is unknown.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Personal Information
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Personal Information

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for JLP ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on JLP's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with JLP ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view JLP's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?