Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jackson County Public Schools, NCJackson County Public Schools, NC
VS
Fairfax County Public SchoolsFairfax County Public Schools
Jackson County Public Schools, NC

Jackson County Public Schools, NC

N/A

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://jcpsnc.org
745/1000Moderate

Home - Jackson County School District in North Carolina

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:189
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Fairfax County Public Schools

Fairfax County Public Schools

8115 Gatehouse Road, Falls Church, 22042, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.fcps.edu
699/1000Weak

Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS), located in Northern Virginia, is the nation’s 9th largest public school system, serves a diverse population of more than 180,000 students in grades prekindergarten through 12. Fairfax County high schools are recognized annually by t...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:20,304
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jackson County Public Schools, NC

Jackson County Public Schools, NC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fairfax County Public Schools

Fairfax County Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jackson County Public Schools, NC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairfax County Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Jackson County Public Schools, NC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jackson County Public Schools, NC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fairfax County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairfax County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jackson County Public Schools, NC

Jackson County Public Schools, NC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JAC4511745112625
Fairfax County Public Schools

Fairfax County Public Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FAI16924623
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FAI312080525
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAI305072525

FAQ

Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC company and Fairfax County Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC and Fairfax County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC and Fairfax County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jackson County Public Schools, NC or Fairfax County Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jackson County Public Schools, NC or Fairfax County Public Schools ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC and Fairfax County Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jackson County Public Schools, NC and Fairfax County Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2