Comparison Overview
Jack Henry Banking
Jack Henry Banking
663 W Hwy 60, Monett, 65708, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Jack Henry Banking is a leading provider of the integrated technology platforms banks need to process financial transactions, automate business processes, and manage mission-critical customer and business information. We now serve as the primary technology partner for a...
SoftServe
201 W 5th Street , Austin, 78701, US
Last Update: 12/09/2026
SoftServe is a premier IT consulting and digital services provider. We expand the horizon of new technologies to solve today's complex business challenges and achieve meaningful outcomes for our clients. Our boundless curiosity drives us to explore and reimagine the art...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Jack Henry Banking
SoftServe
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Jack Henry Banking has 32.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SoftServe in 2026.
Incident History - Jack Henry Banking (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jack Henry Banking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SoftServe (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SoftServe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Jack Henry Banking
SoftServe
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.
Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.
Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.
Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.
Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/blob/19b5b74faa78d0816b8d4d4c7d7543fc3520678c/vibe/core/git/repo.py#L411-L431
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/commit/c069ffa1e12fb5f2487b489217c40ab97721d553
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/issues/996
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/releases/tag/v2.25.5
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mistral-vibe-before-2.25.5-remote-code-execution-via-git-post-checkout