Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jack's Family Restaurants, LPJack's Family Restaurants, LP
VS
Panera BreadPanera Bread
Jack's Family Restaurants, LP

Jack's Family Restaurants, LP

124 West Oxmoor Road, Homewood, 35209, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.eatatjacks.com
706/1000Moderate

In 1960, Jack’s fired up its very first grill in Homewood, Alabama. From the get-go, we had the best people serving up the best food you could find, and we treated our customers like family. As our community has grown larger over the years, we’ve remained committed to v...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:2,761
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Panera Bread

Panera Bread

1400 S Highway Dr, Fenton, 63026, US

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
493/1000Critical

Our first bakery-cafe opened in 1987, founded with a secret sourdough starter and the belief that the best part of bread is sharing it. That vision led to the invention of the Fast Casual category with Panera at the forefront, centered around our delicious menu of chef-...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:42,855
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jack's Family Restaurants, LP

Jack's Family Restaurants, LP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Panera Bread

Panera Bread

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jack's Family Restaurants, LP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

Panera Bread has 185.71% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Jack's Family Restaurants, LP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jack's Family Restaurants, LP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Panera Bread (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panera Bread cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jack's Family Restaurants, LP

Jack's Family Restaurants, LP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JAC5292752102225
Panera Bread

Panera Bread

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PANADTSAL1777328877
🔒 Incident : Breach
MATBUMCRUPAN1770710058
🔒 Incident : Breach
PANEDMCAR1769547392

FAQ

Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP company and Panera Bread company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP and Panera Bread, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP and Panera Bread, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jack's Family Restaurants, LP or Panera Bread ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jack's Family Restaurants, LP or Panera Bread ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP and Panera Bread, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jack's Family Restaurants, LP and Panera Bread, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63175
SUMMARY

PlaywrightCapture stored capture-specific configuration and runtime data as mutable class-level variables rather than instance-level variables. Consequently, multiple Capture objects running within the same Python process could share state, including HTTP headers, cookies, browser storage, HTTP credentials, proxy configuration, user-agent settings, geolocation information, and captured request data. In a multi-user or concurrent deployment, information supplied during one capture could therefore persist and be reused by a subsequent or parallel capture. This could result in the disclosure of authentication cookies, credentials, browser storage, or captured request data belonging to another user. It could also cause requests to be performed with another capture's authentication context, headers, or proxy configuration, potentially enabling unauthorized access to remote resources or interference with other capture operations. The vulnerability is resolved by initializing all capture-specific settings and request data as instance variables in the Capture constructor, ensuring that state is isolated between capture operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-62314
SUMMARY

Anubis is a Web AI Firewall Utility that challenges users' connections in order to protect upstream resources from scraper bots. From 1.22.0 until 1.26.0-pre1, lib/policy/checker.go PathChecker.Check() trusted the client-controlled X-Original-URI header before matching r.URL.Path, allowing an HTTP client to match default data/common/keep-internet-working.yaml ALLOW rules such as ^/\.well-known/.*$ and bypass the Anubis challenge. This issue is fixed in version 1.26.0-pre1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-55652
SUMMARY

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.46, header-login with HEADER_LOGIN_TRUSTED_IPS uses getRequestIp() in server/lib/headerLoginAuth.js to trust the client-supplied X-Forwarded-For header before the real socket address, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to send HEADER_LOGIN_ID for any username and receive a meteor_login_token session, including for admin. This issue is fixed in version 9.46.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-55576
SUMMARY

MaaAssistantArknights is a one-click tool for daily Arknights tasks. In the current dev-v2 workflow, .github/workflows/release-preparation.yml inlined attacker-controlled github.event.pull_request.title into a run: shell command during the pull_request opened, reopened, and ready_for_review events, so a non-draft fork PR whose title starts with Release v could execute shell commands on the ubuntu-latest runner during the generate-changelog job. This vulnerability is fixed by commit cafc3946059e6337d2089d4fec8b6885ba17c332.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-55445
SUMMARY

Qinglong is a timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, and Typescript. Prior to 2.20.1, the init guard middleware in back/loaders/express.ts checks /api/user/init but not /open/user/init, while rewrite('/open/*', '/api/$1') rewrites the whitelisted /open/* path after JWT authentication and the guard have passed; an unauthenticated attacker can send PUT /open/user/init to reset administrator credentials on an initialized instance. This issue is fixed in 2.20.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA