Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Jabra HearingJabra Hearing
VS
Sainsbury'sSainsbury's
Jabra Hearing

Jabra Hearing

8001 E Bloomington Fwy, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55420, US

Last Update: 27/10/2025

View Profile
769/1000Fair

We’re on a mission to empower tens of millions of people to hear better through convenient, personalized hearing care — at a fraction of the cost thanks to telemedicine. In three years, we went from a scrappy startup to a leader in the direct-to-consumer hearing care sp...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:123
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sainsbury's

Sainsbury's

33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://sainsburys.jobs/
678/1000Weak

Over 150 years old and still going strong, we’re the UK’s second-biggest retailer. Every day, the nation shops with us because they know they’ll get affordable, good food and excellent service. We focus on great value and convenient shopping across our family of brands...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:69,917
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Jabra Hearing

Jabra Hearing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sainsbury's

Sainsbury's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jabra Hearing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Sainsbury's has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Jabra Hearing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jabra Hearing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sainsbury's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sainsbury's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Jabra Hearing

Jabra Hearing

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sainsbury's

Sainsbury's

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SAI1771966451
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARCALWAISAITOYTHEMORPET-TE1772023906
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PET510052325

FAQ

Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Jabra Hearing company and Sainsbury's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Jabra Hearing and Sainsbury's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Jabra Hearing and Sainsbury's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Jabra Hearing or Sainsbury's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Jabra Hearing or Sainsbury's ?
Between Jabra Hearing and Sainsbury's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Jabra Hearing and Sainsbury's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA