Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

J.McLaughlinJ.McLaughlin
VS
Titan Company LimitedTitan Company Limited
J.McLaughlin

J.McLaughlin

236 Greenpoint Avenue, Brooklyn, 11222, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.jmclaughlin.com
733/1000Moderate

How It Started It all began in 1977, with one iconic vision brought to life by two brothers, Kevin and Jay McLaughlin. A timeless lifestyle brand with a legacy of style and a spirit of connection Timeless Style We pride ourselves in creating effortless and enduring st...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:371
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Titan Company Limited

Titan Company Limited

#193, Veerasandra,, Electronic City, Bangalore , 560100, IN

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.titancompany.in
822/1000Good

Titan Company Ltd is the organization that brought about a paradigm shift in the Indian watch market when it introduced its futuristic quartz technology, complemented by international styling. With India's two most recognized and loved brands Titan and Tanishq to its cr...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,157
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
J.McLaughlin

J.McLaughlin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Titan Company Limited

Titan Company Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.McLaughlin in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Titan Company Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - J.McLaughlin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.McLaughlin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Titan Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Titan Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
J.McLaughlin

J.McLaughlin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
J-M1011091725
Titan Company Limited

Titan Company Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between J.McLaughlin company and Titan Company Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between J.McLaughlin and Titan Company Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between J.McLaughlin and Titan Company Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - J.McLaughlin or Titan Company Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - J.McLaughlin or Titan Company Limited ?
Between J.McLaughlin and Titan Company Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between J.McLaughlin and Titan Company Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA