Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

J & P Richardson UtilitiesJ & P Richardson Utilities
VS
GHDGHD
J & P Richardson Utilities

J & P Richardson Utilities

114 Campbell Avenue, WACOL, 4076, AU

Last Update: 18/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jpr.com.au
756/1000Fair

JPR UTILITIES J & P Richardson Industries (JPR) offers design, construction, engineering, in house manufacturing, electrical installation and 24/7 maintenance and breakdown support. We are also a RTO, offering a broad range of nationally accredited and non accredited co...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:81
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GHD

GHD

133 Castlereagh St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ghd.com
790/1000Fair

We are committed to addressing the world’s biggest challenges in the areas of water, energy and communities. GHD is a global network of multi-disciplinary professionals providing clients with integrated solutions through engineering, environmental, design and construct...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:16,813
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
J & P Richardson Utilities

J & P Richardson Utilities

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GHD

GHD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J & P Richardson Utilities in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GHD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - J & P Richardson Utilities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J & P Richardson Utilities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GHD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GHD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
J & P Richardson Utilities

J & P Richardson Utilities

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GHD

GHD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities company and GHD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities and GHD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - J & P Richardson Utilities or GHD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - J & P Richardson Utilities or GHD ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities and GHD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between J & P Richardson Utilities and GHD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9