Comparison Overview
J & P Richardson Contracting

J & P Richardson Contracting
114 Campbell Avenue, WACOL, 4076, AU
Last Update: 11/03/2026
J & P RICHARDSON INDUSTRIES J & P Richardson Industries (JPR) is one of Australia’s longest established Electrical Contracting and Engineering firms, offering 60 years local experience and proven project delivery. This, combined with parent company Vinci Energies’ leadi...

Signify
High Tech Campus 48, Eindhoven, North Brabant, NL, 5656 AE
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Signify (Euronext: LIGHT Signify is the world leader in lighting for professionals and consumers. We unlock the extraordinary potential of light for brighter lives and a better world. Our global portfolio of brands deliver advanced products, connected systems and servic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

J & P Richardson Contracting







Signify






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for J & P Richardson Contracting in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Signify in 2026.
Incident History - J & P Richardson Contracting (X = Date, Y = Severity)
J & P Richardson Contracting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Signify (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Signify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

J & P Richardson Contracting

Signify
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.