Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ivy TechnologyIvy Technology
VS
NVIDIANVIDIA
Ivy Technology

Ivy Technology

undefined, Dublin, Ireland, D17 XD90, IE

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ivytech.com
758/1000Fair

Ivy Technology - Your Global Service Innovator Ivy has been operating for over 35 years continually delighting our customers. Our name represents the trust we will earn every day by providing superior service to our clients and our clients'​ clients. Ivy is your tr...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:983
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95050

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nvidia.com
791/1000Fair

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The company’s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:44,040
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ivy Technology

Ivy Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ivy Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

NVIDIA has 560.38% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ivy Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ivy Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ivy Technology

Ivy Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NVI1781685010
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SER1781072827
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852

FAQ

Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ivy Technology company and NVIDIA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ivy Technology and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ivy Technology and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ivy Technology or NVIDIA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ivy Technology or NVIDIA ?
Between Ivy Technology and NVIDIA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ivy Technology and NVIDIA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA