Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AJMC: Institute For Value Based MedicineAJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine
VS
Molina HealthcareMolina Healthcare
AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine

AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine

N/A

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

The Institute for Value Based Medicine® brings together local healthcare leaders to explore real-world applications of value-based care. Each event features expert insights and regional perspectives, set in an elegant venue with gourmet dining. The atmosphere fosters me...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Molina Healthcare

Molina Healthcare

200 Oceangate, Long Beach, 90802, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

Molina Healthcare is a FORTUNE 500 company that is focused exclusively on government-sponsored health care programs for families and individuals who qualify for government sponsored health care. Molina Healthcare contracts with state governments and serves as a health...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:17,475
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine

AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Molina Healthcare

Molina Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Molina Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Molina Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Molina Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine

AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Molina Healthcare

Molina Healthcare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MOL233819422
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOL648072825

FAQ

Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine company and Molina Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine and Molina Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine and Molina Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine or Molina Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine or Molina Healthcare ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine and Molina Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AJMC: Institute For Value Based Medicine and Molina Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8