Comparison Overview
ITW Performance Polymers

ITW Performance Polymers
30 Endicott Street, Danvers, Massachusetts, 01923, US
Last Update: 01/11/2025
A BUSINESS OF ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS — providing customers with polymer-based product solutions for commercial and industrial use since 1912. With 45,000 employees globally, we focus on innovating, manufacturing and selling world-leading and trusted brands Chockfast®, Dens...

Solvay
Rue de Ransbeek 310, Brussels, Belgium, BE, 1120
Last Update: 04/04/2026
For over 160 years, Solvay has been a pioneer in science and innovation, mastering the essential chemistry that powers progress across generations. We are more than a chemical company — we are a catalyst for sustainable transformation, delivering vital solutions that sh...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ITW Performance Polymers







Solvay






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ITW Performance Polymers in 2026.
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Solvay in 2026.
Incident History - ITW Performance Polymers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ITW Performance Polymers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Solvay (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Solvay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ITW Performance Polymers

Solvay
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.